
The inyourskin Relationships and Sexuality Education program is the most recent example proving how radical gender and sexuality ideology dominates the nationâs schools.
Parents need to realise their children are being indoctrinated with bizarre and unnatural beliefs about what it means to be male or female.
Instead of gender and sexuality being biologically determined and God-given, in pre-schools and primary and secondary schools children and teenagers are being taught gender and sexuality are fluid and dynamic social constructs and they can identify anywhere on the LGBTIQA+ spectrum.
The inyourskin program offers a comprehensive relationships and sexuality education to a range of clients including government and non-government schools, state and territory education departments and professional bodies including the Association of Heads of Independent Schools of Australia.
Under the heading of Student Workshops topics covered include exploring the
âgeneral experience of queer students (and) the harmful impact of gender binary languageâ
and
âtaking a gender transformative approach⊠to develop a healthy and realistic sense of the âotherââ.
While the program offers a range of less controversial services and workshops dealing with sexual violence, consent and the dangers of intoxication, the materials showcased on the inyourskin Instagram account illustrate how woke and controversial the program is.
Under the heading What is the Sexuality Spectrum? students are told sexuality has âinfinite possibilitiesâ and that everyoneâs âsexual identities and orientations are complex and uniqueâ. When describing pansexuality, students are told an individualâs gender need not be restricted by âbiological sex, gender or gender identityâ.
In this fluid and dynamic world of woke gender ideology children and teenagers are told the possibilities are limitless as they have the right to choose between whether they are ânon-binary, genderqueer, a Sistergirl or Brotherboy, genderfluidâ.
When it comes to the question of virginity, those responsible for the inyourskin material also adopt a very woke, new-age approach. Under the heading âVirginity is a harmful social constructâ students are told âvirginity is not something that can be definedâ and that the concept of virginity âperpetrates a heteronormative contextâ where the assumption is âgender is binaryâ.
Other examples of what materials schools are offered include: âWhat is ethical porn?â, âInternational safe abortion dayâ and âWhat is binding?â where students are told âBinding is a process of flattening the chestâ and that âBinding can positively impact on a personâs mental healthâ.
If programs and resources produced by the inyourskin were an isolated example of what is happening in schools then matters would not be as distressing. If such programs were balanced, objective and based on common sense and morally sound, they might be of some benefit.
The reality, though, is that since the gender fluidity Safe Schools program was developed in 2010, radical gender and sexuality activists have targeted schools and students in their campaign to overturn the nuclear family and indoctrinate students with their destructive ideology.
The national professional body for government schoolteachers, the Australian Education Union, argues the school curriculum must acknowledge and celebrate those identifying as LGBTIQA+ on the basis societies like Australia are guilty of heteronormativity, cis-genderism and homophobia/transphobia.
The Australian Association for the Teaching of English tells classroom teachers they fairy tales like Cinderella and Sleeping Beauty, plus Shakespeareâs Romeo and Juliet and Jane Austenâs Pride and Prejudice are also guilty as they normalise the love between a woman and a man.
Itâs common for primary and secondary classrooms to display rainbow flags, to tell students to use gender neutral pronouns like âtheyâ and âzieâ and to celebrate Pride month and IDAHOBIT Day.
Some schools go to the extent of inviting drag queens into the classroom, having non-gendered uniforms and allowing students who self-identify differently to their birth sex to use the toilets and changing rooms they feel best suits their new identity.
Ignored in the rush to overturn biology and common sense â men have penises while women have vaginas, can give birth, and breast feed babies â is how wrong it is to indoctrinate young and vulnerable children and teenagers with controversial views about gender and sexuality.
Misgivings and concerns about the medical and ethical dangers in encouraging children and teenagers to deny their biological gender and sex explains why medical experts and doctors in the UK and Europe are warning that the move to embrace radical gender theory must be stopped.
It is also wrong to deny the right parents have as their childrenâs primary care givers and moral guardians to be responsible for their childrenâs education regarding gender and sexuality.
Itâs time for Australian politicians to follow the example of Ron DeSantis in Florida and support parents in their battle to assert their rights and protect their children.
This article was first published in the Daily Telegraph.
Dr Kevin Donnelly is a Senior Fellow at the ACUâs PM Glynn Institute and author of The Dictionary Of Woke. He is one of Australiaâs leading conservative public intellectuals, and has been actively engaged in the culture war since 1992. Kevin is committed to a liberal view of education, one based on truth and wisdom, and on Christian morals and beliefs. With years of experience researching, publishing and speaking on education, culture and religion, he is a sought after commentator in Australian media and conferences.
Be part of the solution
This content is produced and published without censorship or paywall by the team at The Good Sauce, thanks to Good Sauce Supporters. If youâd like to be part of the independent media solution by helping us produce more content like this, become a Good Sauce supporter today.


