🎺 What could happen if the sleeping Church was awakened & equipped? • FIND OUT how you can help “Awakening the Church” today 🎺

Senator Malcolm Roberts in an extended, honest interview

by

23 Jan, 2026 | Video | 0 comments

The following summary of the video above is by CAS News.

There are moments in politics when the mask slips. When the language of “safety”, “harmony” and “community protection” gives way to something far more sinister: raw power, exercised in haste, cloaked in moral panic, and aimed squarely at silencing dissent. According to Senator Malcolm Roberts, that is exactly what we are witnessing with the Albanese Government’s latest omnibus hate speech, anti-Semitism and firearms bill. And if Australians are not paying close attention, they soon may not be allowed to speak freely at all.

In this wide-ranging interview with Topher Field, Senator Roberts lays out a devastating critique of legislation he describes as unnecessary, dangerous, and deliberately ambiguous. Clocking in at around 500 pages including explanatory notes, the bill is, in his view, unreadable for ordinary citizens and impenetrable even for experienced lawyers. That is not an accident. As Roberts argues, clarity is meant to be a foundational principle of law. When a law is vague, it ceases to guide behaviour and instead becomes a weapon—selectively enforced, politically useful, and deeply intimidating.

At the heart of the bill are two major shifts. First, existing civil provisions around racial and religious vilification are escalated into criminal offences, carrying penalties of up to five years’ imprisonment. Second, the threshold for committing an offence is dramatically lowered. It is no longer necessary for someone to actually be harmed, or even offended. If a judge believes that a hypothetical “reasonable person” might fear harassment—or even feel aggravated—then a crime may have been committed. Worse still, strict liability applies. Intent no longer matters.

As Roberts and Field both point out, this means the state can prosecute Australians without a single complainant, without proof of intent, and based on entirely speculative emotional responses. That is not justice. That is administrative punishment.

If you are serious about loving your neighbour and seeking first the Kingdom of God, do not miss the next Church And State conference near you.

Perhaps most alarming is what the bill does not do. Despite being sold as a response to rising anti-Semitism and extremist violence, Roberts insists it does nothing to prevent terrorism, radicalisation, or real-world attacks. Existing laws, he notes, were already sufficient to address events like the Bondi massacre—had they been enforced. Instead, this legislation leaves genuine hate preachers untouched, even providing them with effective guidelines on how to continue preaching hatred under the protection of religious quotation. Meanwhile, critics who challenge or rebut those ideas may find themselves at greater legal risk than the extremists themselves.

The bill’s omnibus nature is also central to the strategy. By bundling hate speech provisions with firearms restrictions, the government forces MPs into false choices—support parts they oppose in order to back parts they agree with. It is classic wedge politics, designed to fracture opposition and rush through sweeping changes before the public can respond.

Roberts is scathing in his assessment of both major parties. He accuses Labor of using the bill as a political cover-up for security failures, and the Coalition of weakness, division, and complicity in laying the groundwork for Australia’s expanding censorship regime. In contrast, he positions One Nation as the only party offering principled resistance, warning that Australia is sliding into “managed decline” under a de facto uniparty more interested in control than accountability.

Whether one agrees with Roberts or not, the stakes he outlines are enormous. This is not merely a debate about offensive speech or public order. It is about who gets to decide what can be said, who may speak without fear, and how much power the state should hold over the inner lives of its citizens.

Which is why this episode matters—and why you should watch it in full. If Australians are to remain free to think, speak and argue openly, these conversations cannot be ignored. Make sure you watch the entire episode of The Topher Project and judge for yourself what kind of country this bill is really shaping.

Too good not to SHARE!

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comments below...

Topher Field is a Multi-Award Winning Australian Documentary Film Maker, Multi-Award Winning Libertarian Political Commentator, and Human Rights Activist and Author of Good People Break Bad laws. Youtube, Topherfield.net

CLICK HERE to visit ProtectingChildren.com.au and support our sponsors